← JaesonBooker.com

AI Risk Ledger

Last refreshed—

Forecasts on AI catastrophe, misuse, and governance from Metaculus, Manifold, Polymarket and Kalshi, next to published expert estimates. Each figure links to its source. Prices refresh every six hours from each platform's public API.

Live questions

Probability of YES. Bars share one 0–100% scale. The change column compares today with 30 days ago.

Expert estimates

Stated views, not markets. Updated by hand when new estimates are published.

Individual p(doom)

Log scale. Bars show a stated range. Each person defines "doom" and the time horizon differently.

Surveys, tournaments and models

Structured, aggregated estimates.

How to read this

Sources differ in kind

Metaculus shows a community forecast with no money at stake. Manifold uses play money. Polymarket and Kalshi trade real money, so their AI questions lean short-term and policy-focused. The participation column shows forecasters, traders or dollar volume.

Extinction markets are biased low

A market on human extinction can never pay out on YES, so traders have little reason to bid it up. Read the Manifold "wipe out humanity" prices as a lower bound on what traders believe, not a fair estimate.

Implied figures

Metaculus asks about AI catastrophe as a chain of conditionals. Rows marked "Implied" multiply the chain: P(10% population decline) × P(caused by AI | decline) × P(95% or more | AI catastrophe). Those rows are our calculation, not a Metaculus forecast.

No real-money market on AI mass casualties

Polymarket and Kalshi list no market on AI killing a share of humanity. Their AI questions cover regulation, lab behavior and AGI announcements. A market on AI killing 10% of people could still pay out to survivors, so its absence reflects listing and regulatory choices rather than the payout problem that breaks extinction markets.

Definitions are not aligned

"Catastrophe", "wipe out" and "p(doom)" mean different things on each platform and to each person. Compare rows only when their wording and time horizon match. Low-participation markets are shown but should carry little weight.